Animal Sciences Assessment Plan
Assessment Plan: Animal Sciences (Three Options: Equine Science, Livestock Management and Industry, and Science)
Fall 2016, Patrick Hatfield
Program Learning Outcomes
Our graduates will:
- design and evaluate animal management systems by synthesizing and applying knowledge
of biological processes related to animals and the rangeland plants that support them.
[knowledge] - identify and critically evaluate scientific or technical animal science content to
make
informed decisions providing a foundation for lifelong learning. [critical thinking] - demonstrate effective oral and written communication to a range of audiences and within
collaborative environments. [communication and collaboration] - use scientific principles to formulate questions, explore solutions, and solve real-world
problems and advocate based on science. [problem solving] - be able to actively engage in discussions of complex ethical issues in their profession. [ethics]
- demonstrate animal husbandry and plant identification skills. [skills]
Curriculum Map
<add courses in curriculum, mark with I (introduce), D (develop), M (mastery) >
| Outcomes | |||||||
| Cr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| AGSC 342 Forages | D | M | D | D | |||
| ANSC 205 Introduction to Meat Evaluation | |||||||
| ANSC 215 Calving Management | I | I | I | I | I | ||
| ANSC 222 Livestock in Sustainable Systems | I | I | I | I | I | ||
| ANSC 232 Livestock Management Sheep | I | I | I | I | I | ||
| ANSC 234 Livestock Management Beef | I | I | I | I | |||
| ANSC 308 Livestock Evaluation | I | I | I | I | |||
| ANSC 316 Meat Science | D | M | M | D | I | I | |
| ANSC 320 Animal Nutrition | D | D | I | I | I | M | |
| ANSC 321 Physiology of Reproduction | D | D | D | D | I | ||
| ANSC 322 Principles of Animal Breeding and Genetics | D | D | D | D | I | ||
| ANSC 337 Diseases of Domestic Livestock | D | D | D | D | D | ||
| ANSC 410 Veterinary Entomology | |||||||
| ANSC 416R Meat Processing | M | M | M | M | M | M | |
| ANSC 418 Topics in Beef Cattle Nutrition | M | M | D | D | D | M | |
| ANSC 421 Assisted Reproductive Techniques | D | D | D | D | D | M | |
| ANSC 432R Sheep Management | D | M | M | D | D | ||
| ANSC 434 R Beef Cattle Management | M | D | D | D | I | ||
| ANSC 436 Professional Development in Beef Sciences | D | D | D | D | D | ||
| ANSC 437 Professional Development in Feedlot Systems | D | D | D | D | D | ||
| ANSC 498 Internship | D | D | D | D | D | ||
| BIOM 405 Host-Associated Microbial Ecology | D | D | M | D | D | ||
| EQUH 110 Western Equitation | I | I | I | I | I | I | |
| EQUH 114 English Equitation | I | I | I | I | I | I | |
| EQUH 207 Intermediate English Equitation | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUH 210 Intermediate Western Equitation | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUS 233 Horse Science and Mgmt Lab | I | I | I | I | I | I | |
| EQUH 253 Starting Colts | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUH 256 Developing the Young Horse | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUH 314 Equestrian Instruction Methods | D | D | D/M | D/M | D | DI | |
| EQUS 206 Equine Ethology | I | I | I | I | I | I | |
| EQUS 327 Equine Lameness | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUS 346 Equine Reproduction Management | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUS 347 Form and Function | |||||||
| EQUS 410 Equine Exercise Physiology | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
| EQUS 423 Equine Nutrition | M | M | D | D | D | M | |
| EQUS 430 Horse Management | |||||||
| NRSM 101 and 102 Natural Resource Conservation | I | I | I | I | I | ||
| NRSM 235 Range and Pasture Monitoring | D | D | D | ||||
| NRSM 236 Small Pasture Management | |||||||
| NRSM 240 Natural Resource Ecology I D | I | D | |||||
| NRSM 353 Grazing Ecology and Management | D | D | M | D | D | ||
| NRSM 453 Habitat Inventory and Analysis | M | D | |||||
| NRSM 455 Riparian Ecology and Management | M | M | M | M | M | ||
Student Performance: Data Sources
Assignments such as quizzes, papers, lab assignments, presentation that are embedded in the following courses will serve as the source of data to assess the six outcomes.
| Outcomes | |||||||
| Cr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| ANSC 316 Meat Science | X | X | |||||
| ANSC 416R Meat Processing (presentation) | X | X | |||||
| ANSC 432R Sheep Management | X | X | |||||
| ANSC 434R Beef Cattle Management | X | ||||||
|
ANSC 418 Topics in Beef Cattle Nutrition |
X | ||||||
| ANSC 421 Assisted Reproductive Techniques | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
|
BIOM 405 Host-Associated Microbial Ecology |
X | X | X | X | X | ? | |
Response Threshold
At least 80% of students will be rated "Acceptable" or higher on assessments for each individual learning outcome.
Schedules
Outcomes
| YEAR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 |
| 1 | X | X | ||||
| 2 | X | X | ||||
| 3 | X | X | ||||
| 4 | X | X | ||||
| 5 | X | X | ||||
| 6 | X | X | ||||
Process for Assessing the Data
Annual Assessment Process
-
Data is collected from identified courses.
-
Random samples of collected assignments are scored by two faculty members using
prepared scoring rubrics.
-
The assessment coordinator tabulates the scores. Areas where the acceptable performance
threshold has not been met are highlighted.
-
The scores are presented to the faculty for assessment.
-
The faculty reviews the assessment results, and makes decisions on how to respond.
-
If an acceptable performance threshold has not been met, a faculty response is required. Possible responses:
o Gatheradditionaldatanextyeartoverifyorrefutetheresult. o Changesomethinginthecurriculumtotrytofixtheproblem. o Changetheacceptableperformancethreshold.
o Chooseadifferentassignmenttoassesstheoutcome. -
Faculty can respond to assessment results even if the acceptable performance threshold has been met.
-
It is OK to determine that changes are not needed when students are demonstrating proficiency with each learning outcome.
-
-
A summary of the year’s assessment activities and faculty decisions is reported to the Provost’s Office in your Department’s Annual Assessment Activities report.
Appendix 1
Department of Animal & Range Sciences
Animal Science Assessment - Spring 2017
Rubric for the Assessment of: Knowledge
1 = not acceptable; 2 = acceptable; 3 = exceeds acceptable
|
Indicators of Subject Content Knowledge |
1 | 2 | 3 | Score |
| Investigate and Research | Little inquiry; limited knowledge shown |
explores topic with curiosity; adequate knowledge from variety of sources displayed |
Knowledge base displays scope, thoroughness, and quality |
|
| Examine & Identify the problem/question |
Does not identify or summarize the problem/question accurately, if at all |
the main question is identified and clearly stated |
The main question and subsidiary, embedded or implicit aspects of a question are identified and clearly stated |
|
|
Analyzes and Synthesize: Identifies and evaluates the quality of supporting |
no supporting data or evidence is utilized; separates into few parts; detects few connections or patterns |
Evidence is used but not carefully examined; source(s) of evidence are not questioned for accuracy, precision, relevance and completeness; facts and opinions are stated but not clearly distinguished from value judgments |
Evidence is identified and carefully examined for accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness; facts and opinions are stated and clearly distinguished; combines facts and ideas to create new knowledge that is comprehensive and significant |
|
| Constructs & Interprets: Identifies and evaluates the conclusions, implications, and consequences; develops ideas |
combines few facts and ideas; needs more development; conclusions, implications; consequences are not provided |
Accurately identifies conclusions, implications and consequences with a brief evaluative summary; uses perspectives and insights to explain relationships; states own position on the question |
Accurately identifies conclusions, implications, and consequences with a well- developed explanation; provides an objective reflection of own assertions |
|
|
Total |
||||
Appendix 2
Department of Animal & Range Sciences Animal Science Assessment - Spring 2017
Rubric for the Assessment of: Critical Thinking
1 = not acceptable; 2 = acceptable; 3 = exceeds acceptable
|
Indicators of Subject Content Knowledge |
1 | 2 | 3 | Score |
| Investigate and Research | Little inquiry; limited knowledge shown |
explores topic with curiosity; adequate knowledge from variety of sources displayed |
Knowledge base displays scope, thoroughness, and quality |
|
| Examine & Identify the problem/question |
Does not identify or summarize the problem/question accurately, if at all |
the main question is identified and clearly stated |
The main question and subsidiary, embedded or implicit aspects of a question are identified and clearly stated |
|
|
Analyzes and Synthesize: Identifies and evaluates the quality of supporting |
no supporting data or evidence is utilized; separates into few parts; detects few connections or patterns |
Evidence is used but not carefully examined; source(s) of evidence are not questioned for accuracy, precision, relevance and completeness; facts and opinions are stated but not clearly distinguished from value judgments |
Evidence is identified and carefully examined for accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness; facts and opinions are stated and clearly distinguished; combines facts and ideas to create new knowledge that is comprehensive and significant |
|
| Constructs & Interprets: Identifies and evaluates the conclusions, implications, and consequences; develops ideas |
combines few facts and ideas; needs more development; conclusions, implications; consequences are not provided |
Accurately identifies conclusions, implications and consequences with a brief evaluative summary; uses perspectives and insights to explain relationships; states own position on the question |
Accurately identifies conclusions, implications, and consequences with a well- developed explanation; provides an objective reflection of own assertions |
|
|
Total |
||||
